top of page

US Digestive Health

Website Rebuild and Refresh

THE PROBLEM

US Digestive Health is one of the largest gastroenterology practices in the country. The old US Digestive Health website lacked a user-friendly navigation and search experience, hindering a patient's ability to access critical healthcare resources and services. An optimized website would ensure patients can easily find providers, offices, prep information, and patient portals.

THE OBJECTIVE

Streamline the navigation and search functionality for patients; build a simplified database to house hundreds of providers; refresh the design and branding.

​

The redesigned website will ensure patients' timely access to essential care, enhance the search experience,  and cement US Digestive Health's reputation for having the national standard of digestive care excellence

Project Summary

US Digestive Health has one of the largest digestive health networks in the country. The network of practices, providers, and offices were interwoven in such a way that made it hard to hide the complicated relationship between these variables from the user. The client asked my team to build a new website  with a refreshed design, a more streamlines search functionality, and a more simplified provider database that would allow  patients to efficiently locate their colonoscopy provider and essential resources.

​

Challenges faced:
 

  1. Complex provider-office-practice relationship

    • Providers sometimes associate with multiple offices

    • Offices sometimes house multiple providers

    • No clear 1:1 mapping between these entities

    • Necessity to obscure the practice affiliations from the end-user

    • Not all practices have centralized portals or prep instructions

  2. Vast resource database management

    • Extensive repository of providers, patient portals, prep resources, and other forms to manage​​

    • Critical need for patients to have instant access to these resources

  3. Inflexible project timeline

    • Non-negotiable launch week​

    • Limited time for design and development

    • No time for pre-launch testing

  4. High risk functionality

    • The project had a high, potential impact on business goals and organizational success

    • Critical and intricate functionality that needed a tight quality assurance protocol

  5. Budgetary constraints

    • Limited development resources

    • Limited financial resources

 

Solutions:

​

My role as the Digital Project Manager for this account was to develop a detailed and adaptable project plan that could anticipate risks and dependencies, include iterations and overlaps, and work within a tight budget and timeline with limited resources.

 

Firstly, the schedule included an overlapping design and development phase in iterations; it was critical that this project incorporated some agile philosophies in order to work within inflexible constraints.

 

Secondly, due to the complexity and importance of the search functionality, the schedule needed a lengthy and qualitative discovery and requirements phase. I enlisted the support of a  skilled information architect to collaborate in the development of complex wireframes and user journey maps.

 

Thirdly, I advocated for client transparency about the difficulties of the project. In collaboration with account managers and leadership, we negotiated with the client to have a more interactive launch plan. Perfection at initial launch was no longer goal, rather we would continue to make iterative developments to the search function post-launch, giving the agency time to make data-driven changes based on user behaviour.

PROJECT STAGES

Discovery

Lengthy period of client interviews, brand education, project planning, risk assessment, understanding the problem, contract negotiation, resource management.

Definition

The longest phase that included workflow mapping of the relationships between the datasets, detailed wireframes development for the entire search journey, drafting requirements for developers, assessing risks, making schedule updates based on the result of this phase.

Debrief

An important phase of assessing our successes and challenges while drafting a plan for post-launch plan for evolving the search functionality to help smooth out the kinks and ensure a seamless experience for the client's patients and providers.

Development

The second longest phase began as early as the second phase and continued past launch. It included developing the database, developing a provider portal, building the search functionality, implementing the new design, developing a hefty QA protocol, developing post-launch testing.

Design

The shortest phase, although no less important, included translating the final frames into mocks. We had 2 rounds of review for the client or review, aiming for a simple and clean look.

EXAMPLES OF THE FINAL RESULT

bottom of page